<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Matt Cutts &#8211; W3C Validation not a Ranking Factor in Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glendaledesigns.com/news/103.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glendaledesigns.com/news/103.html</link>
	<description>News, Tips &#38; Articles for WordPress, Miva Merchant, SEO/SEM</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 23:49:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glendale Designs</title>
		<link>http://glendaledesigns.com/news/103.html/comment-page-1#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Glendale Designs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glendaledesigns.com/news/?p=103#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment, Cesar - I agree - but it is nice if it validates :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment, Cesar &#8211; I agree &#8211; but it is nice if it validates <img src='http://glendaledesigns.com/news/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cesar Castro</title>
		<link>http://glendaledesigns.com/news/103.html/comment-page-1#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Cesar Castro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 16:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glendaledesigns.com/news/?p=103#comment-62</guid>
		<description>I think that some people are somewhat obsessed with w3c standards, yes, it&#039;s nice that it validates, but is nothing really necessary (and sometimes it blocks older or different browsers unless a lot of hacks are involved).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that some people are somewhat obsessed with w3c standards, yes, it&#8217;s nice that it validates, but is nothing really necessary (and sometimes it blocks older or different browsers unless a lot of hacks are involved).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Matt Cutts - W3C Validation not a Ranking Factor in Google &#124; Glendale Designs News -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://glendaledesigns.com/news/103.html/comment-page-1#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Matt Cutts - W3C Validation not a Ranking Factor in Google &#124; Glendale Designs News -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glendaledesigns.com/news/?p=103#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by glendaledesigns. glendaledesigns said: Matt Cutts – W3C Validation not a Ranking Factor in Google http://bit.ly/g73xZ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by glendaledesigns. glendaledesigns said: Matt Cutts – W3C Validation not a Ranking Factor in Google <a href="http://bit.ly/g73xZ" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/g73xZ</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

